This wiki is archived and useful information is being migrated to the main bzflag.org website

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ideas"

From BZFlagWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
:At least an unprotected one. If it was protected and had "real" approved ideas, it would be different. [[User:DonnyBaker|DonnyBaker]] 13:05, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:At least an unprotected one. If it was protected and had "real" approved ideas, it would be different. [[User:DonnyBaker|DonnyBaker]] 13:05, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::There's no point in having a protected ideas page, we have the SF.net trackers, the enhancements forum on bzbb, and so on for that.  I'm not quite sure what the expected usage of this page was when it was created on the old wiki, and the only real use I see for it now is that it allows unstructured collaborative editing (which apparently isn't used, since everyone seems to sign their ideas...). [[User:DTRemenak|DTRemenak]] 13:12, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:12, 14 March 2007

Should ideas that have already be implemented be deleted? This list is getting kinda long.

Yes, if they have actually been implemented, they should be removed. We might also think about archiving this page occasionally. Also, please sign your comments on talk pages. DTRemenak 18:17, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
My other concern is how do we manage these ideas? If they get archived, should some stay here (good ones) and if so what would be the criteria? This page makes me kind of uncomfortable from a management position? I'm not sure a wiki is the best place to gather information like this. DonnyBaker 05:44, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
At least an unprotected one. If it was protected and had "real" approved ideas, it would be different. DonnyBaker 13:05, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
There's no point in having a protected ideas page, we have the SF.net trackers, the enhancements forum on bzbb, and so on for that. I'm not quite sure what the expected usage of this page was when it was created on the old wiki, and the only real use I see for it now is that it allows unstructured collaborative editing (which apparently isn't used, since everyone seems to sign their ideas...). DTRemenak 13:12, 14 March 2007 (EDT)